Starting A Model Portfolio Part II: Picking The Right Photographer

How To Pick The Best Photographer For Your Portfolio

You're a tiger!​

You're a tiger!​

You’ve gone this far in your research; you now want to pick the right photographer. You are in luck because there are thousands of photographers you can work with. As a new model there are tons of people who are willing to work with you for free. Great right? The old saying you get what you pay for could not be truer at this stage.  You can certainly build a portfolio with budding photographers but you will not get the results of an experienced professional.

What to Look for In A Photographer

Consistent Quality

Look to see if they have a good sample of high quality work. Photographers have work displayed all over the internet. They may have Flickr accounts, Facebook fanpages, Model Mayhem portfolios, and portfolio websites. Take a look at these different portfolios and see if they have a consistent amount of work you think is high quality. You can even look at dates of those being published to see the evolution of their work

Shooting Style

Does the photographers work match the style of work you want to pursue? If you want to become a high fashion run way model look for a photographer that has experience lighting and posing a more avante guard style of work. Conversely if you want to be on the cover of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition, that takes a very different style of posing lighting, and composition. Think about what target market your portfolio will attract, and what look you are trying to achieve.

Processing Style

The final images you will receive can be very different from what you see while shooting in the photographers LCD screen. Some photographers go for a very natural untouched look, while others do a fair bit of processing. This can include adding various filters, a varying amount of skin retouching, or other artistic choices. These come down to personal preference. Try to examine how the images have been touched up and if that adds to detracts value for you as a client. There can be a fine line between interesting looking and tacky.

Niche vs. Versatility

Some photographer’s images all look the same; while some are so varied it’s hard to imagine the same photographer took all those shots. When you are starting off it’s nice a get a range of different looks in your portfolio so it’s helpful to look for someone who can shoot and edit a lot of styles. If you have a specific style of modeling in mind hiring a photographer who specializes in that is your best way to go.

Personality

Starting off as a model can be pretty intimidating/scary. It can be nerve racking being in front of the camera as a novice especially when you are working with a complete stranger. I believe it’s critical to work with someone with whom you can create a good rapport with and have fun while shooting. There are incredibly talented artists out there who have zero social skills and create discomfort for new models. Often discomfort seeps into the images and the final product is not ideal. Pick someone you will enjoy shooting with. Not only will a good experience produce better results, but it will encourage you to continue shooting.

 

15 Signs You Are A Photographer

Signs you are a photographer.jpg
  • Most of your Facebook statuses are “Editing tonight” or “Check out this teaser”

  • Currently or at one time your profile picture is a film noir style low key black and white photo of yourself

  • You have numerous odd shaped black bags – carrying cases for every piece of equipment imaginable

  • You have a love-hate relationship with Instagram

  • You raise an eyebrow when your friends with DSLRs call themselves photographers (Photographer friends of yours probably did the same when you told them you were a photographer)

  • You have an accountant friend who would like free photos taken as a favour, but charges you to do your taxes

  • You can be awake at all hours of the day and be in any condition to get the perfect shot

  • You can never stop buying equipment. There is always something you need

  • When attending weddings you don’t watch the bride and groom, you watch the photographer

  • You love the stack of gold boxed in your closet and will never throw them away (If you’re a Cannon person insert whatever colour your camera products come in. Black and red? If you are a Hasselblad user you probably have mahogany boxes in your Penthouse storage closet).

  • You see in f-stop

  • You own numerous books on photography and Photoshop you have never read, but you love looking at the pictures

  • You hate the fact the women keep hair elastics on their wrists (at some point you forgot to check)

  • You have to justify to friends/spouse why you spent $90 on a little piece of plastic that has something to do with lighting

  • You have purchased stupid pieces of $90 plastic, you regret buying because you never use them

 

Cool or Cliché

There are numerous concepts, backgrounds, techniques that take the photography world by storm. Some are long lasting, some come and go very quickly, while some stay on to become a mindless cliché. A lot of us know they are cliché yet we still do them. We have our reasons, for some just look cool, some evoke a common emotional response, while others are trying to look artsy. I will be the first to admit I’m a huge hypocrite, or borrow inspiration, but I will declare that openly. What I won’t do is try to pass something off as being artistic when it’s not. To me photos can serve different purposes. They capture memories, capture something amazing looking, are used commercially, are used to evoke emotion, tell a story, or just looking interesting. I don’t think there is anything wrong for taking a photo of something that looks cool, or using a common technique, as long as you’re clear as to what you are representing.

Cool or Cliché Photography – There is a fine line that separates those. Sometimes what’s cool becomes cliché very quickly, sometimes what’s cliché looks very cool and should be recreated. Below I summarize types of images that are redone a lot. Some veer towards the cliché side while some if executed well are pretty cool. Some I have a strong opinion on while others I have more ambiguous/hypocritical feelings towards. Some views are expressed pretty sarcastically so watch for those ;)

Cool Vs. Cliché

The black and white photo of a homeless man (can include poor children, or people in ratty clothing in third world countries)

Please stop with these. Too many of these photos are exploitative of those individuals for the sake of you trying to look artistic. It had artistic value about 20 years ago when it was first done, now they just look cliché.  When visiting new places there are so many interesting things to photograph that you should not rely on what others have done in the past. While getting a snapshot of daily life in another place can be interesting, I would instead like to see images of what the photographer had a connection to. If you do a portrait of a person you had an interesting interaction with and that photo can tell a story I think that speaks volumes over trying to illicit a sad emotional response from guilt.

Models against graffiti background

Why do we love models against weird backgrounds? Especially when the background feels out of place. Have a girl in a beautiful dress in some grungy back alley with spray paint and old tires. To me backgrounds should enhance a photo by either providing context, serve as a beautiful backdrop to make the overall image look better, or be very simple and non-distracting to focus on the subject. Would you rather have a couple in front of a brick background or stunning waterfall? That question is often answered by personal taste. Some prefer simplicity, while others like the striking beauty of nature to give oomph to a photo. Others like the contrast of location to the subject, while some like the visual interest in “different” looking backgrounds. My issue is when someone chooses an odd looking background again for the sake of looking artsy.

HDR – High Dynamic Range

You may not know the term for it, but you have surely seen these images before. You know the really surreal looking photos where you can’t tell if they are a painting or digital artwork. This is one of those cases where a cool technique is adopted by a few, someone makes software for it and boom everyone is popping out surreal looking landscape images or 50’s Chevrolets. A modest use of this technique I think is perfectly acceptable, but when you go full out HDRey and your image looks like it belongs  airbrushed on an 80s van then I think it’s too much.

Girl looking out window

What is she looking at? Why is she in her underwear? For some reason photos look very intense when someone looks away from the camera out of a window. That pensive look of the model, the contrasty natural lighting comingin through the window, and usually black and white makes for some deep stuff.

Select Saturation

This refers to black and white photos that have a select part of the image in colour. It could be a flower, or the grooms boutonniere, or other part of the image you want to stand out. This can look good 3% of the time. Some people can pull it off, again if done in moderation. For most people it ends up looking silly and amateur.

Wearing Cultural Clothing

You know what makes for a very deep and interesting photo? Get a Caucasian model to wear cultural garb from a far away and exotic land. It can certainly be interesting to highlight different cultures and traditions. Often that’s what makes photography so enticing to viewers is seeing something they are not used to. To me it gets ridiculous when you try too hard to create something exotic. Those photos feel forced and often have ignorance and stereotypes peppered throughout the image.

Marilyn Monroe Pastiche

Please no more Marilyn Monroe remakes, imitations, etc… We all know Marilyn Monroe was an amazing cultural figure. She has some of the most iconic images in the history of photography. Why do people insist on recreating these? They have been remade to death.

Old, rusting, rotting things

Old cars, pieces of metal, fence, logs decomposing. We like taking pictures of old crappy things. No one takes a picture of a brand new wooden fence in suburbia. But wait 50 years until that wood rots, maybe has some aforementioned spray paint and you’ve got photo magic.

There you have a small list of things that can be cool or cliche. I would love to hear your comments. Is there something I missed? Am I completely wrong in your opinion and you want to destroy my argument?